Talk:Japanese destroyer Matsu (1944)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 14:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this shortly. Harrias talk 14:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, life got away from me a little. Review below:
References
[edit]- References all appear to be to reliable sources.
- References are consistently formatted in an appropriate style.
Images
[edit]- Only one images is used in the article, which is appropriately licensed and captioned. Consider adding alt text, but this is not a GA requirement.
Prose
[edit]- No duplicate or disambiguation links.
- It would be nice to include the date of her sinking in the lead.
- "..as the IJN intended.." Explain the abbreviation on first use.
- "The Tachibanas had a range.." Is this a copy and paste error?
- You betcha!
- "The ships carried a total of 25 Type 96 25-millimeter (1 in) anti-aircraft guns in 4 triple and 13 single mounts." The infobox says 4 triple and 12 single.
- "..was returning to Japan on three days later.." No need for "on".
- "..spotted by a search plane from Task Force 58's Task Group 58.1 (TG 58.1)." Clarify which nation TG 58.1 was with.
- "..that sank all but one of the cargo ships and damaging three of the escorts." sank/damaging are not the same tense: swap damaging to damaged.
- "The survivors continue north towards.." And change this to "continued".
- "The convoy is caught.." "was caught".
A few minor prose issues, but otherwise typically good work. Harrias talk 15:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching all these niggles.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:29, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- All sorted, passing now. Harrias talk 21:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)